from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/1IqJLna
via IFTTT
Stark & Stark Shareholder Gary Forshner, member of the firm’s Real Estate, Zoning & Land Use Group, authored the article “Affordable Housing a Critical Component of N.J.’s Economic Growth,” which was published on June 26, 2015, by the The Star Ledger. The article discusses how the March 10th New Jersey Supreme Court ruling on affordable housing can impact the state’s economic growth.
The landmark decision will give affordable housing oversight back to the trial courts and will require municipalities to zone for more affordable housing projects in order to provide a variety of housing options for households of all income levels. Municipalities have been able to hide from these requirements because they have not been properly regulated by the executive branch. Gary points out, that since 1999, “no administration – neither Republican, nor Democratic – has proposed regulations to comply with the Mt. Laurel decision and the Fair Housing Act.”
Due to poor regulation, there are few viable affordable housing options availabe, and Gary opines that the lack of affordable housing has negatively impacted New Jersey’s economic growth. One point he makes is that more people than ever are moving back home to live with their parents, or out of state, because they cannot afford their own housing in New Jersey. He also argues that businesses may pass on locating in New Jersey because they would need to pay their employees more because the affordable housing options are so limited. He asks, “Why would a company locate in New Jersey when the housing costs are so high and their workers are unable to afford decent housing?”
You can read the full article by clicking here. For more information about this recent landmark decision, please click here.
By Michael Gorny, Esq.
You have planned for months. You and your children are going to take the vacation to end all vacations this summer. Well, the summer is here, but the whimsical dreams about lazing on the beach and hiking through the rain forest may be dashed if you don’t “know before you go.” Indeed, increased concern about international child abductions has lead the Department of Homeland Security and the State Department to institute certain policies and procedures for single parents travelling internationally with a child. Parents should pay mind to these special considerations, particularly with your summer travel plans here at last.
To that end, it is important to remember that more than a mere verbal agreement is required from your child’s other parent prior to travel, both when applying for a passport and at the time of travel. Here is a quick primer of the type of information you may want to know before traveling:
Obtaining a Passport:
Time of Travel:
NOTE TO PRACTITIONERS: Practitioners should take note of particular concerns surrounding parents who may be travelling from abroad to exercise visitation or parenting time with children located in the United States. Of the significance in that regard is the New Jersey case which made national headlines in 2011, Innes v. Marzano-Lesnevich, in which jury found a matrimonial attorney liable for $1.4 million for giving a client her daughter’s passport, with which the attorney’s firm had been entrusted to prevent the girl’s removal from the United States. The state appeals court recently remitted the verdict by $442,000. Due to these and other such concerns, suggesting that a passport of the child and/or the visiting parent be held for safekeeping at a local police department or by a third party neutral may be best practice when concerns with child abduction may exist.
Safe travels!
______________________________________________________
Eliana T. Baer is a contributor to the New Jersey Family Legal Blog and a member of the Family Law Practice Group of Fox Rothschild LLP. Eliana practices in Fox Rothschild’s Princeton, New Jersey office and focuses her state-wide practice on representing clients on issues relating to divorce, equitable distribution, support, custody, adoption, domestic violence, premarital agreements and Appellate Practice. You can reach Eliana at (609) 895-3344, or etbaer@foxrothschild.com.
Homeowners who had temporary or trial agreements to modify their mortgages under the Federal home affordable modification program also known as HAMP can sue for breach of contract of the modifications denied and they may even have a consumer fraud claim so long as they complied with or met with the terms set forth in the trial.
This is an overwhelming win. Our office has heard many stories from people who sought modifications and enrolled in a trial program but in the end were just throwing good money after bad. It is our opinion that the mortgage companies and financial institutions have engaged in consumer fraud. If you have been cheated out of a mortgage modification after having a trial, where you made all payments properly, please feel free to call us for help.
Contact us today to review your rights with a NJ Foreclosure or NJ Bankruptcy attorney. Call for your free consultation 800-709-1131.
Exposure to Second Hand Smoke and Workers' Compensation