Federal Trade Commission v. Shire Viropharma, Inc., ___ F.3d ___ (3d Cir. 2019). A former President of the United States famously uttered the statement that, in interpreting his testimony under oath, “it depends on what the meaning of ‘is’ is.” Today’s opinion by Chief Judge Smith addressed whether the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. §53(b), […]
The post The Meaning of “Is Violating” or “Is About to Violate the Law” Does Not Cover Past Violations appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.
from Appellate Law NJ Blog https://ift.tt/2U80vsN
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment