“Confusing,” “Contradictory,” and “Obscure” Provision of Consumer Contract Claimed to Mandate Arbitration is Held Not to Do So

Kernahan v. Home Warranty Administrator of Florida, Inc., ___ N.J. ___ (2019).  When the Supreme Court grants review based on a particular issue raised by the petitioner, but the petitioner subsequently abandons that issue, the Court has at least three options.  First, the Court can vacate its grant of certification, a path justified by the […]

The post “Confusing,” “Contradictory,” and “Obscure” Provision of Consumer Contract Claimed to Mandate Arbitration is Held Not to Do So appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.

from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://bit.ly/2sjMSdC
via IFTTT