“Reasonable Expectations of the Insured” Did Not Defeat Clear Policy Exclusion of “Insured vs. Insured” Claims

Abboud v. National Union Fire Ins. Co., ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2017).  This opinion by Judge Ostrer interpreted an “insured vs. insured” exclusion in a directors and officers liability insurance policy.  That exclusion generally bars coverage for claims by one insured against another, such as counterclaims brought against plaintiff by his fellow officers […]

The post “Reasonable Expectations of the Insured” Did Not Defeat Clear Policy Exclusion of “Insured vs. Insured” Claims appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.

from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2sUBzLh
via IFTTT