Comparative Negligence of John Doe Defendant is Generally to be Considered in Apportioning Damages

Krzykalski v. Tindall, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2016).  This was an auto accident case.  At trial, the jury was allowed to consider in the comparative negligence mix not only defendant’s negligence but that of a John Doe defendant whose driving had a role in the collision.  The jury found Doe 97% negligent and […]

from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2hdJGIR
via IFTTT