Tuesday, January 31, 2017

The Supreme Court Will Review a UCC Case, an Important Discovery Issue, and Another Criminal Case

The Supreme Court announced that it has granted review in three more cases.  In Granata v. Broderick, the question presented, as phrased by the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office, is “Among other issues, can an attorney’s pledge of anticipated counsel fees be considered a security interest under Article 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code?  The Appellate […]

The post The Supreme Court Will Review a UCC Case, an Important Discovery Issue, and Another Criminal Case appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2jR0oCh
via IFTTT

Divorce & Family Law Seminars in South Jersey

The Marlton office at Stark & Stark will be hosting three seminars in the next three months that will focus on various aspects of divorce and family law, and will be free and open to the public. Additionally, all three presentations will be held in the Marlton office.

The first seminar is Recent Changes to New Jersey Child Support Law, and will be held on February 28, 2017 from 5:30-6:30pm. On February 1, 2017 the Child Support laws in New Jersey are changing! Among the major changes is the adoption of a presumptive emancipation age at 19 years old and a new burdens on parents receiving child support. See how these changes and others might impact you.

The second seminar will be Family Obligations: Understanding College Contribution & Emancipation. This presentation will take place on March 30, 2017 from 5:30-6:30pm. This seminar will break down the intricacies and questions surrounding college contribution and emancipation. The discussion will explain the child support calculation, the factors applied by a court to determine a parent’s obligation to contribute to college and more.

The third and final seminar will be Bankruptcy and Divorce: What to Expect Before, During and After Filing, and will be held on April 27, 2017 from 5:30-6:30pm. This presentation will discuss what to expect during a divorce that involes bankruptcy at all stages. Our co-host will be Lee M. Perlman, Esq. from the Law Offices of Lee M. Perlman. Mr. Perlman focuses his practice on Bankruptcy and will give vital insight on what to expect during this process.

If you have any questions, or would like to speak with someone about these seminars, please send an email to events@stark-stark.com.



from New Jersey Law Blog http://ift.tt/2kmOi4K
via IFTTT

Friday, January 27, 2017

Gymboree – Next Retailer Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing?

On the heels of The Limited bankruptcy filing, another retailer appears to be on the precipice of Chapter 11.

Gymboree (Gymboree Corp.) reported yesterday that its CEO, Mark Breitbard will be stepping down once a successor is appointed. Breitbard will assume the role of Chairman of the Board effective February 1st.

It was also reported that Gymboree has retained Lazard as a financial advisor and Kirkland & Ellis as legal advisor for restructuring options. Can a bankruptcy filing be far behind?

With the closing of all of the Limited’s stores and the announcement that teen retailer Wet Seal will close all 171 of its stores, a Gymboree bankruptcy would add to the recent bloodbath for apparel retailers. Landlords must be wary of their rights while retailers continue to falter.

For more information on how landlords or developers can protect themselves against tenant bankruptcy filings and how Stark & Stark can assist you, please contact Thomas Onder, Shareholder at (609) 219-7458 or tonder@Stark-Stark.com and Joseph Lemkin at 609-791-7022 or jlemkin@stark-stark.com.

Mr. Onder writes regularly on commercial real estate issue and is a member of ICSC and Chair of the 2016 ICSC PA/NJ/DE Next Generation Committee. Mr. Lemkin is a member of the American Bankruptcy Institute and regularly speaks on bankruptcy issues.



from New Jersey Law Blog http://ift.tt/2k1B8aD
via IFTTT

OPRA Requests Can be Requested Under OPRA

Scheeler v. Office of the Governor, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2017).  In these consolidated appeals, plaintiffs each sent requests under the Open Public Records Act, N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 to -13 (“OPRA”), to various public agencies.  Those requests all sought copies of other OPRA requests made of those agencies within specified time frames.  The agencies […]

The post OPRA Requests Can be Requested Under OPRA appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2kaRtvZ
via IFTTT

FAQs on Real Estate Revaluations

Each year select municipalities appraise all properties within their borders in order to have all tax assessments reflect the current full and fair value of each property within the taxing district. The process, known as a revaluation, is alarming to property owners since they do not know whether their taxes will increase, decrease, or stay the same.

In 2017, revaluations were completed in Trenton, New Brunswick, Milburn, and many other municipalities in New Jersey. This article will address frequently asked questions that we have received over the years.

Are revaluations conducted so the municipality can collect more tax revenue?

The answer is no. The budgeting and tax assessment processes are related, but separate functions. Each municipality will pass a budget on an annual basis, whether or not a revaluation is done. Generally, the tax revenue will be used to pay for municipal services, fund local schools, and pay a portion of the County’s expenses. The budget is generally adopted sometime during the summer of each year. The tax assessor is not involved in the budgeting process.

However, the tax rate is determined by dividing the budget by the aggregate assessment of all towns. Assume that a municipality has a budget of $10 million and, prior to the revaluation, all properties in the town had an aggregate tax assessment of $250 million. The tax rate in the town would be $4.00 per $100 of assessed value. Further, assume that after the revaluation, the aggregate assessments increase to $500 million (average assessment doubles). If the budget does not change and remains at $10 million, the new tax rate will be $2.00 per $100 of assessed value ($10 million divided by $500 million). Under both scenarios, the township only gets $10 million of revenue.

However, in a perfect world, if the revaluation numbers are current and accurate, the tax burden should be spread fairly within the municipality. Of course, this assumes that allocating taxes based upon the fair value of real estate is a fair in the first place – a discussion for another day.

Why does a municipality perform a revaluation?

In New Jersey, it would be too costly to value property on an annual basis. In addition, most municipalities have part time tax assessors making it virtually impossible for the assessor to have sufficient time to value each and every property in a municipality. As a result, New Jersey has adopted a “ratio” system where each town has an average ratio of sale price to tax assessment. The ratio changes each year depending on market factors. For example, when property values are increasing, the ratios will drop.

However, when properties in a select municipality are not being assessed at the same rate of true value, or are being assessed substantially below true market value, a revaluation may be required. A municipality can decide to perform a revaluation by itself, or the local County Board of Taxation can order a municipality to complete a revaluation. In either case, the revaluation plan must be approved by the Director of the State Division of Taxation. The factors reviewed in determining whether a revaluation is necessary include:

  • Whether the last revaluation was more than 10 years ago,
  • Whether there have been significant zoning or neighborhood changes,
  • The accuracy of property record cards, and
  • Most important, whether there is a significant deviation of individual assessments/sale ratios from an overall average assessment sales ratio for the town.

For example, if a municipality has a ratio of 60%, and a statistical analysis over a two year time period shows that the average assessment to sale ratio over that time period is 80%, the deviation is significant and indicates the ratio is no longer accurate.

Will my taxes increase after the revaluation?

The answer is maybe. Generally, when a revaluation is completed, a portion of the municipality will experience an increase in taxes, a portion will remain the same, and a portion will have their taxes reduced. For example, if your property was over-assessed prior to the revaluation, there is a likelihood your taxes will decrease. However, if you have an older home in town and the assessment was too low, you may see an increase in your tax assessment.

Will I have an opportunity to meet with the revaluation company to discuss my assessment?

The answer is yes. Revaluation companies will send you a preliminary number before making the number final with the local county tax board. At that time, you have an opportunity to meet with the revaluation company.

What do I do if the revaluation company will not change the value?

File a timely tax appeal.

If I file a tax appeal challenging the revaluation company, who has the burden of proof?

Once a tax assessment is placed on a property, the tax assessment is presumed to be correct. The “presumption of correctness” places the burden on the party appealing the tax assessment to submit strong proofs to establish that the tax assessment is incorrect.

It is very important to note that you must come forward with very good proof. For residential properties, this requires you to find comparable sales, generally within the municipality and within the year preceding the tax assessment.

In the event you have any questions concerning a revaluation of real estate tax assessments, please do not hesitate to contact Stark & Stark’s tax appeal attorneys.



from New Jersey Law Blog http://ift.tt/2kBUcQa
via IFTTT

Wednesday, January 25, 2017

A PUBLIC SERVICE ANNOUNCEMENT ABOUT RETAINING YOUR DIVORCE LAWYER

As a matrimonial litigant, you never want to feel that your lawyer does not know how best to take you through the divorce or post-divorce process.  After spending substantial sums of money on an advocate to aid you through a difficult and emotional process, let’s just say that “the blind leading the blind” is not the vibe that you want to be left walking away with.

Unfortunately, however, it happens way too often and I cannot tell you how many times I have had consults with potential clients during which I am told about how disappointed he or she was with prior counsel.  I have had several recent cases where I am left baffled and scratching my head at the inability of a matter to move forward to a trial or settlement – not because of difficult parties or issues of complicated substance, but, rather, a lawyer on the other side who simply does not seem to know what he or she is doing.

The experiences to which I allude are all the more reason to heed the following points when selecting your divorce lawyer:

  • Does the lawyer practice exclusively in the area of matrimonial law? You want a lawyer who knows the law, right?  You also want a lawyer who knows how the law has been applied, how it fits to the facts of your case, and how and when it may be changing.  While no lawyer is going to concede to you that he or she does not know the law, or that acting on your behalf will be a new experience, always do your due diligence before meeting with the attorney to see what you are really dealing with.  Aside from discussing with your referral source, perhaps review the attorney’s online profile to see what articles he or she has written, or what presentations he or she has given on family law topics.
  • Is your lawyer familiar with the judges, lawyers, mediators and experts who may be involved in your matter? This point coincides with the first point.  A lawyer who is well versed in or only practices in the area of family law will more likely be familiar with the people you will come across in the course of your matter.  Knowing how your spouse’s lawyer operates, knowing which mediator may be good or bad for your case, and knowing which expert can best address your financial or custodial needs is of great importance in properly presenting and proceeding in your case.
  • Do you feel comfortable in communicating with your advocate about the law and the facts of your case? You are going to get to know your lawyer very well.  You want to be able to confide in that person all of the good and the bad that may have happened during your marriage, as well as anything that may impact upon your divorce proceeding.  Providing your lawyer with such information and allowing him or her to best address such issues is one of the reasons why you retained that lawyer in the first place.
  • Do you strategize with your lawyer in a way that addresses many different potential approaches while also taking litigation costs into consideration? There are many, many…many different types of divorce lawyers.  There are lawyers who prefer the path of least resistance to get you to a resolution, lawyers who are always aggressive, and so many others in between.  The lawyer you retain should fit your goals and motivations of what you want or believe your divorce matter should be.
  • Is your lawyer responsive to your needs? Responsiveness is one of the issues that I hear about most often from clients who have had prior counsel.  You want to ensure that your attorney gets back to you in a reasonable time to address any issues that you may have.

These are just a few of the critical points that you should consider in retaining matrimonial counsel.  Every lawyer is different, as is every client.  Finding the right match for you is not a decision to be taken lightly, and should be based on a consideration of several factors.  Your attorney is someone who you are going to confide in more than most other people in your life, including, on occasion, your family and friends.  Trust and comfort in your lawyer’s ability to advocate on your behalf is a critical, if not the most critical decision that you may make during the entire divorce process.

_____________________________________________________

Robert A. EpsteinRobert Epstein is a partner in Fox Rothschild LLP’s Family Law Practice Group and practices throughout New Jersey.  He can be reached at (973) 994-7526, or repstein@foxrothschild.com.

Connect with Robert: Twitter_64 Linkedin

 



from NJ Family Legal Blog http://ift.tt/2jesun8
via IFTTT

Tuesday, January 24, 2017

A New Test for Statute of Limitations Choice of Law Decisions: Restatement Section 142

McCarrell v. Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc., ___ N.J. ___ (2017).  Justice Albin’s opinion for a unanimous (6-0, with Justice Patterson not participating) Court today referred to “our evolving choice-of-law jurisprudence.”  Today’s opinion, which adopted the test of the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws §142 for the determination of choice of law in the statute of limitations context, […]

The post A New Test for Statute of Limitations Choice of Law Decisions: Restatement Section 142 appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2kqznCR
via IFTTT

Monday, January 23, 2017

A Murder and Arson Case for the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court announced that it has granted review in State v. Prall.  The question presented, as phrased by the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office, is “In this trial for murder and arson, did the trial court err in admitting testimony about defendant’s prior threats and in its handling of testimony concerning the victim’s belief that […]

The post A Murder and Arson Case for the Supreme Court appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2jJV6qB
via IFTTT

Friday, January 20, 2017

Plaintiffs Have Standing to Sue for Data Breaches That Violate the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Even Without More “Concrete” Injury

In re Horizon Healthcare Services Inc. Data Breach Litig., ___ F.3d ___ (3d Cir. 2017).  [Dislcosure:  My firm, Lite DePalma Greenberg, LLC, is co-lead counsel for the successful plaintiffs in this appeal].  Horizon Healthcare Services, Inc. (“Horizon”) provides health care insurance to millions of New Jersey citizens.  Horizon kept insureds personal identifying information on laptop […]

The post Plaintiffs Have Standing to Sue for Data Breaches That Violate the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Even Without More “Concrete” Injury appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2kb6QFm
via IFTTT

33 Years Since Mount Laurel II

Today is inauguration day for Donald Trump.  He and his designee to head the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Dr. Ben Carson, might take a lesson from a decision issued on this date in 1983 by a unanimous Supreme Court of New Jersey.  That opinion is Southern Burlington Cty. NAACP v. Mount Laurel Tp., […]

The post 33 Years Since Mount Laurel II appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2jHbvOE
via IFTTT

Thursday, January 19, 2017

Who has Standing to File a Will Contest?

Should a person wish to file a Will contest, the first threshold issue which must be addressed is whether that person has standing to file a Will contest.

In general, “standing” means whether a Plaintiff legally has a right to bring a claim to contest a Last Will and Testament in the Court with jurisdiction to hear the matter. The spouse, child, or next of kin of the Decedent automatically have a right to file a Will contest, whether they are named within that instrument or not.

In addition to these family members, a beneficiary under a current or previous Will would also have standing to commence a Will contest. These individuals have standing to contest the current Will even though there may be no blood relationship between them and the Decedent. The rationale for granting these individuals standing is because if the disputed Last Will and Testament is invalidated by the Court, then the Court could require that the Decedent’s previous Last Will and Testament be admitted to probate. For a direct citation to the relevant Court Rule, you may refer to Rule 4:80-1 within the New Jersey Rules of Civil Practice and Procedure which governs standing to contest a Will.

Should a party wish to file a Will contest, they should consult with an attorney to assist them with the process. Standing is merely one factor to consider with regard to a party’s right to file the Will contest; however, it is a threshold issue.



from New Jersey Law Blog http://ift.tt/2k7gxEN
via IFTTT

Wednesday, January 18, 2017

Correctional Facility Did Not Improperly Discriminate Against Muslim Officer in Denying Her the Right to Wear Religious Headgear

Tisby v. Camden Cty. Correctional Facility, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2017).  Plaintiff, a corrections officer at the defendant correctional facility(“CCCF”) since 2002, became a Muslim in 2015.  She began to wear a khimar (also known as a hijab), which is a tight-fitting head covering that Muslim women are obligated by their religion to […]

The post Correctional Facility Did Not Improperly Discriminate Against Muslim Officer in Denying Her the Right to Wear Religious Headgear appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2k1eQVA
via IFTTT

“Pent-Up” Demand for Low and Moderate Income Housing Must be Accounted for as Part of “Present Need”

In re Declaratory Judgment Actions Filed by Various Municipalities, ___ N.J. ___ (2017).  In the Appellate Division decision in this case, reported at 446 N.J. Super. 259 (App. Div. 2016), and discussed here, the panel faced the question of whether a municipality’s affordable housing need for the period of 1999-2015 (a time when the Council […]

The post “Pent-Up” Demand for Low and Moderate Income Housing Must be Accounted for as Part of “Present Need” appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2iBuQkA
via IFTTT

Tuesday, January 17, 2017

Sovereign Immunity Prevails, But the State Police Still Lose

Royster v. New Jersey State Police, ___ N.J. ___ (2017).  Today’s decision is a unique one.  Writing for the majority of five Justices (Justices LaVecchia, Patterson, Fernandez-Vina, Solomon, and Timpone), Justice Solomon affirmed the decision of the Appellate Division that the New Jersey State Police could properly assert the doctrine of sovereign immunity for the […]

The post Sovereign Immunity Prevails, But the State Police Still Lose appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2jlwdB8
via IFTTT

Another Child Abuse and Neglect Case, and a Criminal Case With Constitutional Law Issues, Will be Before the Supreme Court

The Supreme Court announced today that it has granted review in two new cases.  The first, New Jersey Division of Child Protection & Permanency v. A.B., is before the Court by virtue of a dissent in the Appellate Division.  The question presented in that appeal, as phrased by the Supreme Court Clerk’s Office, is “Did […]

The post Another Child Abuse and Neglect Case, and a Criminal Case With Constitutional Law Issues, Will be Before the Supreme Court appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2jWo05H
via IFTTT

Retailer, The Limited, Files for Chapter 11 in Delaware

As predicted last week, U.S. women’s apparel chain The Limited filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection today in the United States Bankruptcy Court for Delaware on Tuesday, after closing all 250 stores, under case number 17-10124. See 10 Retailers to Watch for Possible Bankruptcy Filings in 2017.

This filing continues the trend in the competitive retail apparel industry with shrinking margins, high debt loads, and changing shopping habits of Baby-Boomers and Millennials.

Although The Limited’s stores are closing, the name may continue, as an affiliate of private equity firm Sycamore Partners agreed to provide a $25.75 million “stalking horse” bid for the company’s intellectual property, including trademarks, website address, and social media accounts. The auction regarding the same is expected to be held within 30 days.

It’s a good idea for commercial Landlords and trade creditors to speak with bankruptcy counsel now to ensure claims are properly filed and their rights protected.

Stark & Stark’s Bankruptcy & Creditor’s Rights Group can help. Our bankruptcy attorneys regularly represent landlords throughout the country, including recently in the District of New Jersey, Southern District of New York, District of Delaware, and Eastern District of Pennsylvania on a variety of issues. Most recently, our Group has represented landlords and trade creditors in the EMS, RadioShack, A&P, Joyce Leslie, and Sports Authority Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.

For more information on how Stark & Stark can assist you, please contact Thomas Onder, Shareholder at (609) 219-7458 or tonder@stark-stark.com.



from New Jersey Law Blog http://ift.tt/2ju4cK3
via IFTTT

A Clearly Articulated Statutory Immunity Applies, Even if it Seems Unfair

Kirkpatrick v. Hidden View Farm, ___ N.J. Super. ___ (App. Div. 2017).  A boy who tagged along with his mother to a horse farm but did not himself take part in any horse-related activity there was barred from suing when he was bitten by a horse as he walked by its stall.  The reason for […]

The post A Clearly Articulated Statutory Immunity Applies, Even if it Seems Unfair appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2iDfPtS
via IFTTT

Little League Parent Syndrome

In a case of first impression entitled D.W. v. M.W., the Hon. Lawrence Jones, J.S.C. (Ocean County), has warned parents that their right to attend their child’s Little League games was in potential jeopardy due to “inappropriate public criticism and disparagement of coach decisions.”

The case, which has not concluded with a formal legal opinion, brings to attention a pattern of conduct referred to by Judge Jones as Little League Parent Syndrome. The “syndrome” goes beyond Little League and has in fact reared its head in a variety of children’s sporting events—sometimes with devastating results.

In 2012, a Minnesota man was sentenced to four years in prison for punching and biting off the ear of the opposing team’s coach because his son lost a Catholic youth basketball championship. Another man shined a laser pointer in game goalies eyes to help his daughter win a game; three men modified their sons’ sports gear to cause injuries to other players including one father who modified his son’s helmet to be “sharp enough to shred a magazine cover.”

Other assaults have escalated to frightening levels. In 2000, a suburban Boston father was charged with manslaughter in the fatal beating of another father over “bad” calls at a youth hockey game. There is also the classic case of Wanda Holloway, who in 1991 took out a contract on a 14 year old girl’s mother because that girl got on the cheerleading team instead of her daughter.

The general impression is that parents have gone “over the top” at youth sporting events. Over the years psychologists and behavioral specialists have suggested the actions are due to vicarious association. This means the parents are vicariously living through their children but with an adult aggression. Others suggest that it is based on parental competition to get kids college scholarships and millions of dollars in pro sport earnings; options that are generally warded to only about 1% of youth players.

Judge Jones emphasized that parental behavior should be modified to reflect the Little League tenets of “good citizenship, sportsmanship, and maturity of character” including “proper emotional attitudes about winning and losing.” Parents are, after all, supposed to be setting a good behavior standard for children, not influencing them in the other direction.

The State of New Jersey protects the interests of children under Parens Patriae. Part of that power is to issue orders about custody, care and maintenance of children to safeguard not only their health but also their happiness. This includes the well-being of children who are part of family law court proceedings, such as dissolutions of marriage and custody hearings. The state judicial system considers a child’s well-being to be paramount to other issues. It is not difficult to see that disparaging comments, foul language, and physical attacks directed against coaches, other parents, and young sports players can be are harmful to children. If it escalates it can also result in severe criminal penalties as well as civil damages that can negatively impact family structure.

In an effort to stem the unsettling trend this court offered suggested behavior guidelines for youth sporting events by advising parents to:

  • Adhere to league conduct and behavior rules
  • Refrain from publicly harass or demean any child
  • Refrain from publicly harass or demean any coach or official
  • Refrain from publicly harass or demean any parent or spectator
  • Act in a manner which upholds the dignity of the event

The consequences of aberrant parental behavior at sporting events not only can be prohibition from attending; but in the case of escalated verbal or physical altercations, the risk of criminal or civil liability. It can also result in state action related to protection of your children, custody arrangements, and family health and welfare.

This ruling is long overdue given the “over the top” behavior of a minority of parents at their children’s sporting events. The case and the recommendations support the tradition of our courts to intervene on a flexible basis if they consider the best interests of a child compromised. It will be interesting to see if such guidelines are formalized in future court action.



from New Jersey Law Blog http://ift.tt/2jjZCM4
via IFTTT

Monday, January 16, 2017

The Third Circuit Will Post Video of Certain Oral Arguments

Last Friday, the Third Circuit announced that it will begin to post on its website, www.ca3,uscourts.gov, “videos of oral arguments in select cases,” more specifically, those that are “deemed to be of significant interest to the public, the bar, or the academic community.”  The Third Circuit thus becomes the second Court of Appeals to make oral […]

The post The Third Circuit Will Post Video of Certain Oral Arguments appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2jBTejc
via IFTTT

Britt J. Simon trained in Standardized Field Sobriety Tests

In November of 2016 Britt J. Simon obtained training and is now qualified pursuant to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) in the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests (SFST).  These tests are what, when given properly, allow officers to determine if probable cause exists for arrests relation to Driving Under the Influence (DUI) / Driving While Intoxicated (DWI).

Friday, January 13, 2017

Property Revaluations in Trenton – Now, the Rubber Meets the Road

Trenton’s revaluation has been a long time coming. Originally slated for 2016, it’s official for 2017. Property owners are now receiving notices of the new assessments proposed by the revaluation company hired by Trenton and the Trenton’s assessor. If the new assessment is not scrutinized, the Taxpayer, whether the property owner or triple net tenant, will be stuck with the new assessment.

Trenton is a City in transition. Properties range from abandoned buildings and vacant lots to thriving offices, residential, retail, industrial, and other uses. Because of the vast range in the condition of properties in Trenton and their utility, sales and other data establish values that range all over the place. Simply put, the real estate market has not established a well-defined and clear guide to a property’s market value so the potential exists for a wide range of opinions as to the value of a particular property.

It is important that a taxpayer, whether the property owner or tenant responsible for payment of real property taxes, be vigilant and proactive. What should the savvy property owner/taxpayer do?

  1. First, collect information on the property and other similar properties. Review your assessment. Is it fairly reflective of the property’s market value? Remember that the goal and legal obligation of Trenton and its representatives, the revaluation company, and the assessor is to assess all property uniformly. This means that the assessment or true value of each and every property should theoretically be equal to its market value. That value should be equal to the price that an informed buyer and an informed seller would agree to as of the valuation date, October 1, 2016.
  2. Second, request the property record card. Often mistakes are made during inspections that affect value.
  3. Third, make an appointment with the revaluation company, Appraisal Systems. Occasionally favorable adjustments to assessments result from these meetings.
  4. Fourth, consult with specialists in the field. Remember, Appraisal Systems has already decided that a property is worth exactly the amount of the assessment in your notice. There is a lot of jargon and legal precedent that applies to this field of law which impacts how assessments are determined. It is important to have competent proof of value. For commercial properties, often the services of a licensed real estate appraiser are required. Tax appeal attorneys can guide you at any time during the process, including an appeal to the County Board of Taxation or the Tax Court of New Jersey.

One Last Takeaway

Revaluation programs are very infrequent because of their huge cost. Thus, the assessment placed on the assessor’s books in 2017 will be the assessment for years unless the taxpayer takes measures to mitigate its impact and manage the tax burden.

For further information, please do not hesitate to contact Stark & Stark’s tax appeal attorneys.



from New Jersey Law Blog http://ift.tt/2jFI2kN
via IFTTT

Juvenile Sentencing in Question

Juvenile Sentencings has New Jersey Questioning the System

Thursday, January 12, 2017

The Initial Hearing During a Will Contest

Once a party has decided to contest a Will, the question then becomes what is the next step in this process. The first pleadings that Plaintiff’s counsel prepare for the Court are a Verified Complaint, as well as an Order to Show Cause.

The Order to Show Cause hearing date would be the first hearing at which the Court would hear testimony concerning the disputed Will and Plaintiff’s claim to invalidate this document. It is also common at the return date for the Order to Show Cause for the contesting party to seek a preliminary injunction preventing the distribution of Estate assets pending the resolution of the matter on its merits.

In determining whether the Court should grant injunctive relief during at the initial hearing date, the Court will consider a multitude of factors.

The Court will first consider whether injunctive relief is necessary to prevent irreparable harm to the party filing the Verified Complaint. In addition, the Court will also consider whether the Plaintiff has a reasonable probability of succeeding on its claims, whether the Plaintiff may suffer a greater hardship if their application for an injunction is denied as compared to the Defendant, and whether it is in the public’s interests to grant the restraints.

The Court will often review the facts presented to it and perform a balancing test to determine whether injunctive relief is appropriate at the initial hearing. Recent revisions to the injunctive relief standards have leaned more favorably towards granting injunctive relief in order to preserve the status quo pending a resolution of the matter. Although the first hearing date during the Order to Show Cause is an important one, it is merely the beginning of the Will contest.

Should a party wish to contest a Will, they should consult with an attorney such as the ones at Stark & Stark who may guide you through the initial hearing, as well as all subsequent proceedings.



from New Jersey Law Blog http://ift.tt/2iLI2zn
via IFTTT

Wednesday, January 11, 2017

10 Retailers to Watch for Possible Bankruptcy Filings in 2017

2016 ended on a high note with higher than expected holiday sales and overall a better real estate market. However, there were a number of retailers that sought bankruptcy protection. Some of the retailers, like Fairway and EMS, emerged as new entities in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings while their operations continued. Yet others, like Sports Authority and PacSun, closed their doors, leaving open spaces for landlords.

As we enter the New Year, following is a list of 10 potential impending tenant bankruptcies to keep an eye out for:

  1. Sears Holdings – Recently, a number of Sears and Kmart stores began closing stores across the country. Further, Sears sold its valued Craftsman brand to Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.
  2. Claire’s Stores, Inc. – Clark’s places this chain on the watch list due to high outstanding debt.
  3. The Limited – This company is closing all its stores this month, while continuing to operate online after the closures complete.
  4. CVS – The company plans to eliminate roughly 300 jobs and close 200 stores, equal to about 5 percent of its outlets, according to The Wall Street Journal.
  5. Rue21, Inc. – This retailer is facing tough competition in the youth retail market and hold high debt according to Clark’s.
  6. Chico’s – The company announced it will close 120 stores in the next three years.
  7. American Eagle Outfitters – The company is slated to close 150 of its more than 1,000 stores by the end of 2017. Like a number of other “youth retailers,” American Eagle has struggled recently according to the International Business Times.
  8. Office Depot – In May 2016, antitrust concerns derailed a merger with the office supply retailer and Staples, a competitor. Since then, the company announced it would close about 300 more stores in the next three years, according to Fortune.
  9. The Children’s Place – Another 200 stores are slated to close in 2017, according to chainstorage.com.
  10. Finish Line – The sports apparel closed 54 stores in 2016, and plans to close another 25 stores in 2017, according to indystar.com.

For more information on how to protect your center against these possible upcoming filings, please contact Thomas Onder, Shareholder in Stark & Stark’s Creditor’s Rights Group at (609) 219-7458 or tonder@stark-stark.com. Mr. Onder writes regularly on commercial real estate issues and is a member of ICSC and co-Chair of the 2017 ICSC PA/NJ/DE Dealmaking Show in Atlantic City, NJ, as well has recently represented landlords in the EMS, RadioShack, A&P, Fairway, and Sports Authority Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases.



from New Jersey Law Blog http://ift.tt/2icSt2J
via IFTTT

Noncustodial parents' financial obligations for school

Noncustodial parents and their obligation to financially help their Adult Child through Graduate School

By Gloryanna Diaz

Tuesday, January 10, 2017

Ex-Spouse May be Able to Maximize Expected Social Security Benefits after Divorce

As some readers may know, our Social Security system permits a divorced person (once eligible for benefits in the normal course of events) to receive the greater of (a) the amount he/she would be entitled to in their own name or (b) 50% of their ex-spouse’ benefit provided that the parties had been married for at least ten years and the person has not remarried.

Although New Jersey law generally holds that the marital partnership terminates upon a filing for divorce, the parties remain legally married until the subsequent entry of a Judgment of Divorce.

For Social Security purposes, the latter rule also applies. For example, if a person has been married for 9 ½ years when a divorce complaint is filed, the actual divorce date will govern whether he/she is permitted to exercise option (b) above. Under this model it behooves the person to delay the entry of a Judgment of Divorce for six months so that they qualify for this benefit. If a spouse qualifies and selects the 50% option, it does not change the other party’s benefit payments—the ex-spouse will still be entitled to 100% of the expected payout.

If you are considering marriage dissolution, you should seek the advice of an experienced family law attorney who knows the rules governing support and sustainability after divorce.



from New Jersey Law Blog http://ift.tt/2j3Ig8t
via IFTTT

Friday, January 6, 2017

Judge Carol E. Higbee (1950-2017)

Judge Carol E. Higbee, who has been an Appellate Division judge for two years and, before that, a trial level judge in Atlantic County for 21 years, died on January 3 at age 66.  After a judicial clerkship in Atlantic County (reportedly, she was the first woman law clerk in that courthouse) and a career […]

The post Judge Carol E. Higbee (1950-2017) appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2iYjcNi
via IFTTT

Thursday, January 5, 2017

The Effect of United States Supreme Court Dicta

Coleman v. Superintendent Greene SCI, ___ F.3d ___ (3d Cir. 2017).  Today, Judge Hardiman, writing for the Third Circuit in a habeas corpus case, addressed the weight to be given to dicta from the Supreme Court of the United States.  Lawyers all learn the difference between a holding, the actual rule of decision in a […]

The post The Effect of United States Supreme Court Dicta appeared first on Appellate Law NJ Blog.



from Appellate Law NJ Blog http://ift.tt/2iWwud5
via IFTTT

Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Types of Witnesses During A Will Contest

In ruling upon the validity of a contested Last Will and Testament, there are numerous witnesses whom a Court may hear testimony from in deciding whether to invalidate the will. As is the case in any litigation, fact witnesses who possess relevant knowledge with regard to the facts and allegations set forth in the Complaint are essential witnesses. These witnesses may possess knowledge with regard to the mental status of the Decedent at the time the disputed Will was executed, the relationship that the Decedent shared with his family members, and other issues concerning the Decedent’s physical health and general appearance at the time the contested Will was executed.

In addition to fact witnesses, the Court will often hear testimony from expert witnesses. These experts may opine as to the mental and physical capacity of the Decedent at the time the Will was executed, as well as whether the Decedent was susceptible to undue influence. Undue influence, as discussed in a previous blog, means that another party asserted their dominion or control over the Decedent such that the Will did not reflect the Decedent’s true intentions, but rather, those of the party who asserted the influence.

Aside from fact witnesses and expert witnesses, the Court may also hear the testimony of quasi-expert witnesses. While these witnesses may be experts in their fields, they have not been retained by a party to provide expert testimony. Typically, these types of witnesses may involve treating physicians, nurses, or other health care professionals who may have provided care or maintenance to the Decedent.

Furthermore, the Court may also hear the testimony of the lawyer who drafted the disputed Will, as well as the witnesses to this document. As such, these witnesses don’t neatly fall into the category of expert witnesses or lay witnesses.

Although this blog provides a summary of the types of witnesses who may testify during a Will contest, this is only a short summary of who may offer testimony. Obviously, it is important that experienced counsel be retained in order to properly address the potential testimony of any such witness who may testify during these proceedings.



from New Jersey Law Blog http://ift.tt/2iw4bEJ
via IFTTT